JNofollowREL · TARGET · JOOMLA 4 & 5

SEO & link value · Knowledge

Should internal links ever be nofollow?

The clean rule: internal links are never nofollow. Your own site vouching for its own pages is the point of internal linking – withdrawing that vote wastes value without buying anything.

Since Google's 2009 accounting change, value assigned to a nofollow link evaporates instead of flowing to the other links – internal nofollow is a leak, not a steering wheel.

Why people try it, why it fails – and the right tool per case

The attempts usually aim at three targets. Target one: steering value to money pages by nofollow-ing “unimportant” internal links – that is PageRank sculpting, dead since 2009 (own question), and today it strictly loses value site-wide. Target two: keeping utility pages like login, cart or account out of the index – wrong tool: nofollow on links neither deindexes the target nor reliably prevents crawling (hint status); a robots meta noindex on the page itself does that job properly, and truly private areas belong behind authentication, not behind link attributes. Target three: taming crawl paths through filter and parameter jungles in shops – legitimate concern, wrong lever again: canonical tags, a curated set of indexable filter pages, robots rules for parameter patterns and clean information architecture are the instruments that actually work (the crawl-budget question expands on this). What remains after all three targets dissolve is the affirmative case for internal follow links: your navigation, breadcrumbs, related-content boxes and in-text references are how value and meaning circulate through your own site – the one link graph you fully control. The practical guard: a site-wide nofollow tool must therefore never touch internal links by design – ours doesn't, treating everything on your own domain (plus whitelisted friends) as untouchable, which is precisely the safety property to check in any tool of this class.

Key facts

Related questions

All knowledge topics