JNofollowREL · TARGET · JOOMLA 4 & 5

Background & myths · Knowledge

Where does nofollow come from? A short history

January 2005: Google, Yahoo and MSN jointly introduce rel=“nofollow” – a rare industry alliance, aimed squarely at the comment-spam flood drowning the young blogosphere.

The idea: remove the reward, and the industrial spam economics collapse – links without value inheritance are not worth posting at scale.

Four stations in two decades

Station one, 2005 – the weapon: blogs and forums adopt the attribute wholesale, platforms follow, and paid-link marking soon becomes its second job as search engines tighten guidelines against link selling. Station two, 2009 – the loophole closes: SEOs had discovered “PageRank sculpting”, using nofollow on internal links to steer value flows like plumbing; Google changes the accounting so sculpted value simply evaporates instead of rerouting – the technique dies overnight and survives only as a cautionary tale (it has its own question here). Station three, the blanket era: over the 2010s ever more platforms mark all external links – Wikipedia most famously – until nofollow describes less “I distrust this link” and more “our lawyers distrust everything”; the signal grows blunt from overuse. Station four, 2019/2020 – the reform: Google introduces rel=“ugc” and rel=“sponsored” for the why, and reclassifies the whole family as hints – ranking in September 2019, crawling and indexing from March 2020 – reclaiming the link-graph data the blanket era had buried. The through-line of the story: every station is search engines and site owners renegotiating the same treaty about what a link means – and the current terms (precise labels, hint status, duties for paid links unchanged) are simply that treaty's newest edition, which is exactly the version modern tools implement.

Key facts

Related questions

All knowledge topics